Ocwen To Pay $1M For Force-Placed Insurance Problems

Ocwen’s problems with the 2014 settlement are not its only mortgage servicing issue. It also faces a separate suit from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and has agreed to other regulatory settlements in recent years.

Re-Blogged from www.law360.com

By Evan Weinberger Law360, New York (September 6, 2017, 5:53 PM EDT) — Ocwen Financial Corp. on Wednesday agreed to a $1 million penalty for failing to meet metrics related to the termination of force-placed insurance that was required under a 2014 national mortgage servicing settlement, according to court filings.

The West Palm Beach, Florida-based mortgage firm exceeded the maximum 5 percent error rate on a metric in the settlement that requires the firm to terminate certain force-placed insurance policies and refund prorated premiums within 15 days during the first quarter of 2017, according to a filing in the D.C. district court by state attorneys general charged with monitoring the settlement.

Ocwen reached a 6.54 percent error rate on so-called Metric 29 of the settlement in the first quarter of 2017, the court filing said.

Because the exceeded error rate came just after Ocwen wrapped up remediating similar problems with Metric 29 from 2015 when the problems arose in the first quarter of 2017, Ocwen is subject to the $1 million fine, the attorneys general said.

“Accordingly, because this fail occurred in the quarter immediately following implementation of the corrective action plan, this failure constitutes an uncured potential violation” and subjected Ocwen to a $1 million penalty, the filing said.

Ocwen, which first revealed the first-quarter problems in an Aug. 3 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, did not oppose the request for the $1 million sanction to be applied.

“As Ocwen disclosed in its most recent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-Q, Ocwen exceeded the applicable error threshold on one metric for the first quarter of 2017. As set forth in the monitoring committee’s motion and without agreeing with the monitoring committee’s allegations, Ocwen has agreed to pay $1 million to resolve this matter,” John Lovallo, a spokesman for the company, said.

While not originally a party to the $25 billion 2012 national mortgage settlement, Ocwen took over the servicing operations of Residential Capital LLC, Ally Financial Inc. and other former General Motors Co. lending units. In February 2014, Ocwen agreed to pay $2.1 billion in consumer relief and comply with the settlement’s servicing standards.

The firm has run into several problems with the settlement monitor, former North Carolina Banking Commissioner Joseph Smith, since agreeing to take part in the deal. Smith’s office filed a report on Aug. 25 outlining the problems at Ocwen.

Prior to exceeding the maximum error rate on Metric 29 in the first quarter of this year, Smith’s office cited Ocwen in September 2016 for failing two tests required under the settlement in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Testing was suspended at Ocwen for 2016 as it worked to fix those problems, and the company was subject to regular examinations beginning in the first quarter of this year.

The monitor’s office found problems with the force-placed insurance remediation test under that exam, according to the filing. The settlement mandates that any firm that has a problem in the first exam after being subject to an order to fix earlier problems be required to pay a $1 million penalty, according to the order.

The settlement monitor’s office could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Ocwen’s problems with the 2014 settlement are not its only mortgage servicing issue. It also faces a separate suit from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and has agreed to other regulatory settlements in recent years.

The settlement monitoring committee is represented by Patrick Madigan of the Iowa Attorney General’s Office.

Ocwen is represented by J. Riley Key and Robert Richmond Maddox of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP.

The case is Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Ocwen Financial Corporation et al, case number 1:13-cv-02025, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

–Editing by Christine Chun.

Related Articles

Ocwen Not Fully Complying With Mortgage Settlement: Monitor

Ocwen Financial Corp. in the last half of 2014 failed part of its first full-portfolio compliance review following the $25 billion National Mortgage Settlement, the monitor overseeing the deal told a D.C. federal court Thursday.

Read Full Article

Opinions expressed are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the position of The Gallant Goose & Friends.


Thank you all for your past listenership and support… We look forward to your comments…
Till next time… keep learning, stay enthusiastic and positive and best of luck to each of you in your personal journey!

Greg ‘da Goose & The Team at The Gallant Goose & Friends

Don’t forget to check out and download some 50 archived show recordings at: http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/139335
or “like” us on our Facebook page at: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100011445285616

Note: If you received this via email, you are invited to find it again as a post on our blog at www.gallantgoose.com
Please consider registering as a user on the blog as an alternative to emails – which should allow you to add comments.

———————————————————————————
Remember… “Justice Should Be Blind, NOT You!” TM
Are you tired of watching bankers, corporations, municipalities and others running over you like a small speed-bump?
Realize you are as powerful as the tools you master; So don’t forget to check out some of those valuable tools here at…
OWN THE JUDGE
——————————————————————————————————
Are bill collectors or court cases messing with your credit score or causing credit damage?
go to www.FixMyReport.com
fast… easy… final
———————————————————————————–
The author Greg “‘da Goose”  is the founder and host of “The Gallant Goose & Friends” TM internet radio show and podcast heard on Talkshoe channel 139335. The show focuses on consumer and homeowner defense and attack strategies and provides a forum for guest attorneys, accountants, brokers, bankers and other professionals, activists and “thinkers” to share their general thoughts and opinions with the audience and give the listeners an opportunity for live call-in Q&A with the guests.

Disclaimer: The author is not an attorney, CPA or licensed consumer services professional. Neither this article, other writings or the “The Gallant Goose & Friends” internet radio show constitute legal, accounting or any other state licensed service advice. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author or guests. All information is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Contact a licensed professional in your area for legal or accounting advice.
 “How to Win in Court” and “Fix My Report” are sponsors of The Gallant Goose TM.

Original Work © 2016-2017 GallantGoose.com & The Gallant Goose (TM), All Rights Reserved. Duplication rights granted under “Fair Use Doctrine” non-profit & educational use only. Referenced work of others is the copyright property of the respective authors or their heirs or assigns.
*VOID WHERE PROHIBITED BY LAW*

Leave a Reply